Reflections on the Current State of China’s Friction Materials Industry in Both Domestic and International Markets

Category: Corporate News

Release Date: 2014-11-25

Summary: When it comes to friction materials, they can be hard to grasp for those outside the industry. But if I mention brake pads—do you know what those are? Probably everyone who drives does. Professionals refer to them as safety‑critical braking components. As a safety‑related component, brake pads are subject to industry standards. Given the current state of both domestic and international markets—covering pricing, regulatory frameworks, and the survival prospects of Chinese friction‑material manufacturers—I’d like to share a few personal observations and reflections from an industry perspective. The friction‑materials sector has been present in China for just over a decade. Yet no matter how large the production capacity or export volume of today’s Chinese firms may be, they still cannot claim to be industry leaders. Why is that?

  When it comes to friction materials, they can be hard to grasp for those outside the industry. But if I mention brake pads—do you know what those are? Probably everyone who drives does. Professionals refer to them as critical safety components of the braking system.
  Regarding safety‑related braking components or brake pads, this industry standard—considering the current state of both domestic and international markets, pricing trends, regulatory requirements, and the survival challenges faced by friction‑material manufacturers in China—I would like to share a few personal observations and reflections with industry professionals.
  The friction materials industry has been present in China for more than a decade. Regardless of the current production scale or export volume of Chinese friction‑materials companies, none can yet be considered an industry leader. Why is this the case?
  First, all friction‑material manufacturers in China suffer from weak R&D capabilities. Even those that tout themselves as industry leaders often rank highest only in terms of sales revenue and workforce size, while their product profitability remains among the lowest. For friction‑material exporters, without the support of the government’s export‑tax rebate policy, survival would be extremely difficult. At present, among domestic friction‑material firms, the so‑called R&D institutions that claim to lead the field—frankly speaking—are little more than entities that simply shuffle and tweak a few dozen conventional material formulations; they hardly qualify as genuine R&D centers or technical teams. Severe environmental pollution is the most significant obstacle and barrier to the development of the traditional friction‑material industry, creating challenges such as difficulty in recruiting workers and soaring production costs. Meanwhile, certain unrealistic pursuits of “new materials” and “new processes” are nothing more than marketing tactics employed by domestic and international companies or individuals to drive up material prices, keeping raw‑material costs stubbornly high while leaving product performance and standards essentially unchanged. In my view, this represents a grave crisis for the traditional friction‑material sector.
  Second, product technical standards are low. To maximize profits, most manufacturers lower their technical standards, making it difficult to ensure consistent quality. Intense price wars among competitors, unhealthy market competition, and industry disarray result in the majority of profits being captured by foreign entities.
  III. In China’s friction materials industry, from a technological standpoint, it cannot be said that independent R&D has been achieved; the sector has remained stuck at the technological level of foreign markets from a decade ago. Over the past ten-plus years, there has been no substantial improvement in product technology. Moreover, the production environment drives up manufacturing costs, and foreign customers impose stringent standards on our companies, resulting in extremely demanding procurement conditions. Consequently, Chinese friction‑material exporters are forced to price their products at entry‑level, with unit prices typically ranging between $2, $3, and $4. Meanwhile, domestic friction‑material exporters are locked in cutthroat price wars in the South American and North American markets, leaving them struggling to survive.
  Fourth, China’s friction‑material enterprises are facing an existential crisis. Even among large‑scale firms, it is difficult to ensure that their products meet quality standards. Should the WTO’s full liberalization of electromechanical products usher in competition from foreign firms, the winter for China’s friction‑material industry will be as harsh as that experienced by China’s soybean market. To weather this impending storm, Chinese friction‑material companies must rely on technological innovation and on consolidating and optimizing industry resources.

Keywords: Reflections on the Current State of China’s Friction Materials Industry in Both Domestic and International Markets

Related News

Corporate News